top of page

Abigail Person

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Department of Physiology and Biophysics

Abigail Person's research focuses on the cerebellum and its role in motor control and learning. Her work investigates how cerebellar circuits contribute to the accuracy of motor actions, such as reaching movements in mice. She also explores the integration of sensory feedback and motor commands in cerebellar processing, particularly examining the function of corollary discharge signals and feedback loops within cerebellar pathways.

Mentoring Style

How involved was your mentor in determining your projects' directions?

Funding

Did your mentor apply for funding sufficiently to manage the lab?

Diversity

Was the lab a diverse environment relative to the rest of campus?

Research Breadth

Did the research span many fields, disciplines, techniques, etc.?

Networking

Did your mentor incorporate you into their professional network?

Energy

How did your mentor's energy influence lab morale?

Work/Life Structure

How flexible was your mentor with personal time, schedule, leave, etc.?

Availability

How readily could you meet with your mentor?

Competition vs Collaboration

Was competition or collaboration encouraged for projects, funding, etc.?

Project Sharing

How dependent were you on other members for project completion?

Risk Management

Did the lab reach for high-risk, high-reward projects or incremental impact?

Practicality

Did your mentor emphasize work with direct applications to a project?

Publishing Priority

What did your mentor value when determining where to publish?

Decision-Making

How did your mentor make decisions that affect the group?

Trainee Survey

Maximal Oversight

Avid Applicant

Uniform

Specialized

Networker

Energizer

Structured

Scheduler

Competitive

Independent

High-risk

Translational

Goes with gut

High-impact

Minimal Oversight

Mentees apply

Diverse

Multidisciplinary

Build own network

Energy empath

Flexible

Random walk-ins

Collaborative

Dependent

Incremental

Fundamental

Logical

Scientific Fit

Self Survey

Mentoring Style

How involved was your mentor in determining your projects' directions?

Funding

Did your mentor apply for funding sufficiently to manage the lab?

Diversity

Was the lab a diverse environment relative to the rest of campus?

Research Breadth

Did the research span many fields, disciplines, techniques, etc.?

Networking

Did your mentor incorporate you into their professional network?

Energy

How did your mentor's energy influence lab morale?

Work/Life Structure

How flexible was your mentor with personal time, schedule, leave, etc.?

Availability

How readily could you meet with your mentor?

Competition vs Collaboration

Was competition or collaboration encouraged for projects, funding, etc.?

Project Sharing

How dependent were you on other members for project completion?

Risk Management

Did the lab reach for high-risk, high-reward projects or incremental impact?

Practicality

Did your mentor emphasize work with direct applications to a project?

Publishing Priority

What did your mentor value when determining where to publish?

Decision-Making

How did your mentor make decisions that affect the group?

Maximal Oversight

Avid Applicant

Uniform

Specialized

Networker

Energizer

Structured

Scheduler

Competitive

Independent

High-risk

Translational

Goes with gut

High-impact

Minimal Oversight

Mentees apply

Diverse

Multidisciplinary

Build own network

Energy empath

Flexible

Random walk-ins

Collaborative

Dependent

Incremental

Fundamental

Logical

Scientific Fit

Former and Current Trainees

bottom of page