Get PhitteD
Maggie Stanislawski
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Department of Biomedical Informatics
The Stanislawski’s research focuses on the role of the gut microbiome in health and disease, particularly concerning obesity, cardiometabolic diseases, and inflammatory conditions. Her research involves examining how different dietary interventions, such as intermittent fasting and caloric restriction, affect the microbiome and related molecular profiles like metabolomics and DNA methylation. Stanislawski's work aims to understand how these dietary changes impact the microbiome and how individual responses can guide personalized approaches to diet and exercise for optimal health outcomes. Additionally, she investigates the variability of these molecular profiles across diverse populations to study their influence on cardiometabolic and inflammatory diseases.
Mentoring Style
How involved was your mentor in determining your projects' directions?
Funding
Did your mentor apply for funding sufficiently to manage the lab?
Diversity
Was the lab a diverse environment relative to the rest of campus?
Research Breadth
Did the research span many fields, disciplines, techniques, etc.?
Networking
Did your mentor incorporate you into their professional network?
Energy
How did your mentor's energy influence lab morale?
Work/Life Structure
How flexible was your mentor with personal time, schedule, leave, etc.?
Availability
How readily could you meet with your mentor?
Competition vs Collaboration
Was competition or collaboration encouraged for projects, funding, etc.?
Project Sharing
How dependent were you on other members for project completion?
Risk Management
Did the lab reach for high-risk, high-reward projects or incremental impact?
Practicality
Did your mentor emphasize work with direct applications to a project?
Publishing Priority
What did your mentor value when determining where to publish?
Decision-Making
How did your mentor make decisions that affect the group?
Trainee Survey
Maximal Oversight
Avid Applicant
Uniform
Specialized
Networker
Energizer
Structured
Scheduler
Competitive
Independent
High-risk
Translational
Goes with gut
High-impact
Minimal Oversight
Mentees apply
Diverse
Multidisciplinary
Build own network
Energy empath
Flexible
Random walk-ins
Collaborative
Dependent
Incremental
Fundamental
Logical
Scientific Fit
Self Survey
Mentoring Style
How involved was your mentor in determining your projects' directions?
Funding
Did your mentor apply for funding sufficiently to manage the lab?
Diversity
Was the lab a diverse environment relative to the rest of campus?
Research Breadth
Did the research span many fields, disciplines, techniques, etc.?
Networking
Did your mentor incorporate you into their professional network?
Energy
How did your mentor's energy influence lab morale?
Work/Life Structure
How flexible was your mentor with personal time, schedule, leave, etc.?
Availability
How readily could you meet with your mentor?
Competition vs Collaboration
Was competition or collaboration encouraged for projects, funding, etc.?
Project Sharing
How dependent were you on other members for project completion?
Risk Management
Did the lab reach for high-risk, high-reward projects or incremental impact?
Practicality
Did your mentor emphasize work with direct applications to a project?
Publishing Priority
What did your mentor value when determining where to publish?
Decision-Making
How did your mentor make decisions that affect the group?
Maximal Oversight
Avid Applicant
Uniform
Specialized
Networker
Energizer
Structured
Scheduler
Competitive
Independent
High-risk
Translational
Goes with gut
High-impact
Minimal Oversight
Mentees apply
Diverse
Multidisciplinary
Build own network
Energy empath
Flexible
Random walk-ins
Collaborative
Dependent
Incremental
Fundamental
Logical
Scientific Fit
